Louboutin wins red sole fight with YSL; yet YSL “monochrome” line allowed

Christian Louboutin shoes

Christian Louboutin shoes

Christian Louboutin, the world-known French shoemaker, won a trademark protection for its women’s shoes with red soles and different colored tops. However federal appeals court in Manhattan also ruled that the company cannot trademark a design which is simply red. The court noted that the bright red soles on high-heeled shoes designed by Christian Louboutin are so distinctive that they deserve the trademark protection. The case Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent is said to have been one of high stakes in the high heels fashion world.

Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent

Christian Louboutin, one of the most known producers of exclusive shoes, had sought a preliminary injunction that would have prevented its rival Yves Saint Laurent America Inc. from selling all – red shoes that the French shoemaker  claimed were identical to some if its own models. U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero, however, in August 2011 rejected Christian Louboutin’s claim and said the French shoemaker would probably lose the trademark case against  Yves Saint Laurent America Inc.

Even though, Christian Louboutin did not give up a fight against its American competitor, Yves Saint Laurent. The luxury shoemaker, which has painted soles of its high heels a shade of “China Red” since 1992, decided to sue Yves Saint Laurent in April 2011 after the rival’s announcement of a new line of “monochrome” shoes for women. Paris-based Louboutin claimed that the use of lacquered red on shoe soles was its signature.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York reverse a lower’s court’s finding that a single color could not be trademarked in the fashion industry. Judges affirmed the lower court’s denial of the injection against Louboutin’s rival Yves Saint Laurent and sent the case back to the trial judge. In addition, the U.S. Appeals Court in Manhattan also ruled on Wednesday that Louboutin’s red sole is entitled to the limited trademark protection. The court’s rule extends only to a red lacquered outer sole that contrasts with the color of the rest of the shoe and not to shoes that are monochromatically red though.

As it was stated by U.S. Circuit Judge Jose Cabranes in court’s decision, “The district court’s conclusion that a single color can never serve as a trademark in the fashion industry was based on an incorrect understanding of the doctrine of aesthetic functionality. We conclude that the trademark, as thus modified, is entitled to trademark protection.”

Christian Louboutin has been selling his shoes with red sole since 1992; the luxury French shoemaker registered it as the trademark in the U.S. in 2008. Christian Louboutin’s shoes with red soles were featured, inter alia, in a TV series hit Sex and the City. It sells about 240,000 pairs each year in the United States, with revenues of about $135 million. A pair of Louboutin’s shoes usually costs from $US700 and $US1000; however there are models which are a lot more expensive than that.

Yves Saint Laurent’s monochromatic red

Judge Jose Cabranes also cited in the court’s ruling that Yves Saint Laurent’s use of a red outer sole on monochromatic red shoes does not harm or infringe the rights and the trademark of Christian Louboutin. If Christian Louboutin had been granted broad rights for the color red, it would harm the competition in general, according to the judge. Yet the decision is said to be a kind of setback for the Yves Saint Laurent, which last year celebrated the Judge Victor Marrero’s ruling in August 2011.

Yet Yves Saint Laurent and other shoemakers can use red color on soles as long as the whole shoe is red. So monochromatic red shoes are the only option for those companies, which want to have red soles…

Anna Domanska
Anna Domanska is an Industry Leaders Magazine author possessing wide-range of knowledge for Business News. She is an avid reader and writer of Business and CEO Magazines and a rigorous follower of Business Leaders.

Recent Posts

UK watchdog whacks Amazon with probe for unfair data collection practices

UK watchdog whacks Amazon with probe for unfair data collection practices

The Competition and Markets Authority will focus on whether Amazon, Inc. favors merchants that use its delivery services.
2 days ago
Altice buys 12 percent stake in BT worth £2 billion

Altice buys 12 percent stake in BT worth £2 billion

Altice said it did not intend to make a bid for the British Telecoms company, though the takeover code also does not allow it to make an unsolicited buyout offer for six months wit
2 days ago
G7 countries agree on broad principles of minimum corporate tax deal

G7 countries agree on broad principles of minimum corporate tax deal

The world’s richest nations (G7) reached a landmark accord setting a global minimum corporate tax rate for multinationals. Would it be effective in tackling tax evasion and avoid
2 days ago
BC Partner goes the Continuation Fund way to strike a $7bn deal

BC Partner goes the Continuation Fund way to strike a $7bn deal

BC Partners, a UK private equity firm, has floated a “continuation fund” deal, one of Europe’s largest such deals, by transferring its 47 per cent stake in the academic publi
2 days ago
FDA approves Biogen’s $56,000 drug for Alzheimer’s

FDA approves Biogen’s $56,000 drug for Alzheimer’s

The Food and Drug Administration of the US approved on Monday Biogen Inc’s Aducanumab to treat Alzheimer’s disease amidst the controversy of its efficacy. Biogen has pr
4 days ago
UK watchdog’s plans for big banks to draw fair compete rules draws criticism

UK watchdog’s plans for big banks to draw fair compete rules draws criticism

Under UK Finance’s proposals, nine banks under investigation by the CMA would be obliged to fund a “future entity” for three years.
4 days ago